You gotta love
this, because even though it's chock-full of the usual anti-Southern cant only a sell-out Southerner can write, it's worth reading:
The battle in Washington is not between liberals and conservatives; it is between the Union and the South. The Republican Party that voted unanimously against the stimulus bill is, in essence, the party of the former Confederacy. In the House of Representatives, there is not a single Republican representative from New England. In the U.S. Senate, there is not a single Republican from the Pacific Coast. The Republican congressional delegation is disproportionately Southern.
Deee-licious! As
more folks have second thoughts about the Democrats' socialist, excuse me, "Progressive" agenda, the battle lines that are already forming will make it clear that the South stands for freedom, and against central planning and government control of the economy.
As much as it might hurt, be sure to read the entire Lind article. You wouldn't want to miss this half-apology for his attack on the South:
It is because I am a Southerner and the descendant of Southerners that I recognize the suicidal nature of this pathological regional political culture. I like Southern manners, food, music, and literature—but I hate the reactionary strain of my native region’s politics (there is an enlightened, minority strain in Southern politics, from the Kentuckians Clay and Lincoln to LBJ, the Gores and Bill Clinton).
Uh, Michael, the sell-out politicians you so admire are properly called "scallywags." They might've come from the South, but their hearts and souls (assuming they had any) belonged to the progressive empire that was intellectually and financially headquartered in the North.
And don't imagine Southern or any traditional culture could survive within the universalist, socialist system the sell-out politicians mentioned above worked to impose on us -- after all, it was Bill Clinton who called for a "Third American Revolution" to prove that America could survive without a white majority. Does Lind really think a Third-World majority would continue Southern literary, music, and culinary traditions?
By the way, for a little background, be sure to read my earlier post on the present-day North vs. South battle of socialism vs. liberty as defined by another lefty,
Jesse Jackson, Jr. Interesting parallels to Lind's views.
Yes, we're on to something here, folks ...