Are you part of the American family?
I had to replay this a couple of times to make sure I wasn't hallucinating. But it's real -- Rahm Emanuel implied gun owners are automatically suspect, and then he made this astounding assertion at 1:15 in:
"If you're on that No Fly list, your access to the right to bear arms is cancelled, because you're not part of the American family. There is no right for you if you're on that terrorist list."
Review it a couple of times yourself so his message sinks in: You can be denied basic rights by a secret government process to which there is no appeal.
Emanuel's argument that the government can determine whether you have rights reminds me of what happened to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn when he was arrested for criticizing Stalin. When Solzhenitsyn protested that the Soviet Constitution guaranteed freedom of speech and right to a trial, he was informed that those rights only applied to "loyal" Soviet citizens. He was no longer part of the Soviet family.
Emanuel's proposal is a direct assault on our traditional rights. It is an unconstitutional power grab done in the name of "protecting" us that has already been abused. The Washington Post has reported how non-violent protestors have been branded as terrorists simply because of their political views. Even Ted Kennedy was once detained because a "T. Kennedy" appeared on the No Fly list. Kennedy had enough pull to have his name removed. What chance would a common citizen have? Especially one who's been deemed "disloyal" because he's disagreed with his government.


5 Comments:
Rahm. What a moron.
Like a known Islamic terrorist or terrorist sympathizer is concerned about the right to keep and bear arms, or about access to those arms. Whatever AK 47s they may have in their possession are the least of our worries.
Or like an American patriot who happens to findself on some government list is going to be prevented from exercising his right to keep and bear arms.
Or like we even belong to Rahm's "family" to begin with. Now, it could be, since he's a Chicago politician, that he has a certain definition of "family" in mind that should give us all pause. More likely, however, he presumes to speak for all Americans. I have news for him: his family ain't our family. And whatever his family is, it sure ain't American.
I think maybe he meant "gang."
Snaggle-Tooth Jones wrote, "Like a known Islamic terrorist or terrorist sympathizer is concerned about the right to keep and bear arms"
I know! It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic. The end result, if Rahm & Co. get their way, is that Americans will be caught defenseless when the jihadists strike at the mall, restaurant, school, etc. It's just like the effect of disarming law-abiding Americans up North -- only the criminals have guns.
Blame those great defenders of liberty George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for the no fly list. And shame on the Obama administration for continuing some of the fascist policies of the Bush/Cheney pseudo-Reich.
Anonymous 1,
Some?
The liberals complained incessantly about the Patriot Acts when Bush was in. They seem awfully quiet about it now, though, don't they? No mention at all about repealing them. While Obama hob-nobs with real terrorists, the Patriot Acts are and will be used against those who are in disageement. They are setting the stage already by calling dissenters unamerican, nazis, terrorists, fringe elements, dangerous, etc.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home