Where was Obama born?
And who cares?
I don't. I've received some friendly emails from folks who wonder why I haven't weighed in on this topic. Well, reason number one, I have no idea where he was born. And I'm not motivated to try and find out.
It doesn't matter who the elected dictator of the DC empire is. Whoever holds court in the Offal Office oversees a murderous, criminal regime that exports our jobs, sanctions demographic revolution, and routinely violates our rights. It is an illegitimate government that rules by fraud and force, and it isn't going to be reformed by substituting one stuffed suit for another.


26 Comments:
Quite right Mike. The figurehead doesn't matter. Whoever might be the emperor, he would still represent and further the same interests.
Assuming the South became independent, who would you like to see head up the executive branch? Not meant to be a cute or smart comment--just curious.
Wherever there is that much power, there will be corruption. Manure draws flies. Republican files or Democratic flies, both are blood suckers.
As to the President of a Southron republic, I can offer no names presently. Someone who doesn't want to run my life and who understands and respects the principles of liberty and divided sovereignty.
shadowviper said...
what makes this emperior bad or rather worse..is the fact that he is from ill, now im not the oldest fig on the tree but it doesnt take an einstein to figure out thhat where theres chicago poly-tics theres corruption.
Anonymous, HaroldC,
I believe a 19th century nation-state like the old CSA could deteriorate into tyranny as much as the old USA. As HaroldC points out, where there is that much power, there will be corruption.
"Someone who doesn't want to run my life" wouldn't even be drawn to that much centralized power. So in addition to voting for "none of the above," I'd prefer a city-state, or something on the scale of a Swiss canton.
shadowviper,
Yes! And most people haven't even grasped the significance of that yet. But here's someone who has:
http://vdare.com/sailer/080901_chicago.htm
The whole birth certificate issue is a pointless battle anyway. Even if it was 100% proven that Obama was born in Kenya, half of his supporters would still deny it and the other half would say that it doesn't matter.
The Constitution has already been torn to shreds anyway. In light of what the Feds have done over the past century or so, the fact that Obama doesn't meet a technical requirement to be president is virtually irrelevant.
The only thing that worries me is that we as a nation are setting a dangerous precedent by not demanding that Obama prove his eligibility. If no one in power stands up to him on this, then who will stand up to him in 7 years when he decides to run for his third-term? Obama has already shown his lack of concern for Constitutional rules on term limits by his support for the would-be Honduran dictator.
Anonymous,
Interesting points. And what you say about the Constitution is true.
Sad, but still true. I think it was Clyde Wilson who advised that the Constitution is not a self-enforcing document. The people of the States are supposed to be, but we've gotten fat and lazy.
I would vote for Senator James Webb of Virginia as the second ever Southern nation's president.
I think if the Dahli Bama was exposed as a fraud that he is, then it would hasten devolution.
It would also cause all sorts of havoc on legal or illegal bills he signs.
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html
JUST FYI
Gentlemen: It matters tremendously where B.O. comes from. I understand what you mean - that since this is such a foul System to begin with, that hasn't since at least April 1865 obeyed or followed the Constitution anyway, nor "lived up to" the SPIRIT of the Political Law (as one of my two personal heroes, John Taylor of Caroline, categorized the Constitution) or its UNwritten principles and ideals (but rather has PERVERTED them in every way - pun intended), then "So what - Indeed, who cares?? Just more of the same 'trashing of the Constitution' by the same Dominant Elites anyway."
But this is truly CRITICAL - and strikes to the basis of OUR position, i.e. that the Elites who ACTUALLY control the government NEITHER BELIEVE IN NOR FOLLOW the Constitution, and this time it is NOT a matter of "interpretation" BUT AN OBVIOUS, OPEN, UTTER DISREGARD OF THE DOCUMENT AND ONE OF ITS KEY, MOST FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES: WHO SHALL 'RUN' THIS GOVERNMENT - AMERICANS, OR THOSE WHOM THE SELF-SERVING ELITES CHOOSE??
This is Big - very Big: it is a literal "matter of fact" and literally proves OUR point: the Constitution is DEAD, and this is absolutely vital for a Constituional Order - you are living under some kind of ARBITRARY DESPOTISM when even the most obvious provisions are openly denied and violated. And when the very basis of a Constitutional Order is meaningless AND violated, IT IS TIME TO GO - unless you are happy, and/or willing, to live under a literally ARBITRARY DICTATORIAL DESPOTISM, that DOES whatever it wants, HOWEVER it wants, WHENEVER it wants. And this time it is not just a matter of 'interpretation' - this time it is a matter of FACT - and ALL can see it plainly.
I agree entirely. Obama represents the death and failure of America. Soon there will be fighting over who gets to pick up the pieces.
I used to care whether Obama is an American or not, because I actually believe that the Constitution should be followed. However, I read something (can't remember where) that changed my mind. What if this is just an attempt at disinformation? What better way to discredit conservatives and other political opponents?
Garland: I'm afraid I must be blunt: You, and ALL people who think or believe like you, ARE A DANGEROUS THREAT. No doubt, the Members of the (fatuously named) 'Supreme Court' have been "reading something somewhere" for years, that 'justifies' their clearly ideological 'decisions.' It doesn't matter ONE BIT what you read or where - in ANY Constitutional Order THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF MUST BE FOLLOWED AND OBEYED, especially by any and all members of the Gov't., otherwise you have - MUST HAVE - a despotic dictatorial Order. Why? Simple - those in the Offices of power are neither following nor obeying the literal basis of the gov't. - EXCEPT AS THEY WILL. They, on their 'authority,' ARE THE GOV'T.(Despotism) AND what they SAY and/or DO is the effective rule of the gov't., SINCE THE CONSTITUTION IS MEANINGLESS (Dictatorship). Maybe you'll "read somewhere" that the Constitutional provision limiting Presidents in Office (WHICH B.O. IS NOT!!) to two terms is 'unfair' or something, and will "change your mind" on that too, so a 'coup' that keeps B.O. permanently "in Office" will be O.K. with you and your kind, also.
Lastly, your 'disinformation' speculation at the end or your post is simply IRRELEVANT. This issue is absolutely vital and cannot be ignored for crass 'politics of the moment.' The answer to this issue and how it is handled will determine not only our 'form of government' (for the reasons given above) BUT OUR HISTORY AS WELL, i.e. what life will actually be like FOR ALL OF US. The matter is 'momentous' - and must be dealt with.
Nick,
The constitution has not been respected or enforced by the government for decades. Meaning
1) It IS a dictatorship
2) It IS illegitimate
3) It IS a threat to America's founding stock
4) It IS able to produce as many laws as it wants, and enforce these laws however the elite pleases
5) It robs wholesale the people of their property (taxes) and liberty (excessive legislation).
There are too many laws and there is too much bureaucracy. The system is too big and too corrupt to fix. We need to throw the whole thing out and start over. As in, purge these anti-white, anti-American plutocratic elites and replace them with a principled aristocracy who will respect the constitution as the basis of our republican government.
Timothy P.: You are absolutely right in everything you say, my only reservation is with regard to the form government - I DO agree with you that we need a more stable gov't., stable with regard to fundamental principles. Our Southern forebares had the answer, but erred fatally by joining 'The Union' in 1789. I believe if we go back to THEIR writings, THEIR thoughts, THEIR beliefs with regard to "The Divine Order," i.e. God - Man - Woman - Family - Community - Country, we will have 'the answer.' Let me suggest esp. the writings of John Taylor of Caroline and John Randolph of Roanoke. If you would like sources where they can be acquired, let me know and I will be happy to provide them. (Oh, what the heck - John Taylor can be found at Regnery Publishing (in their Conservative Book Club "Conservative Leadership Series" and also The Liberty Fund - both avail. Online) and John Randolph can be found also at The Liberty Fund.)
Of all the issues, why fight one that can't be won?
There is no way to prove he was not born in the USA. Any document can be claimed to be a forgery. Any expert can be countered with another expert. In the end it's he said, he said.
Does anyone think a Democratic Congress is going to impeach and convict?
Why should Obama provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt, if it keeps some of his opposition concentrating on this?
This reminds me of the hunt for war criminal Dr. Mengele. He drowned and for many years Nazi War Criminal hunters looked for him not knowing he was dead.
The family was asked by a dense reporter, why they had not just said Mengele was dead. By not telling they caused the Nazi hunters to spend time and resources looking for a dead man.
Obama may be causing the opposition to pursue a useless issue.
Thanks Nick for your reading recommendations. You've hinted at a critical aspect of our national decline, and that is that we are faced with severe spiritual decay.
If we can somehow lead a resurgence of faith in those things which are truly important: our God, our family, kinfolk (extended-family), and heritage, we will be well on our way to rescuing our way-of-life, and a future for our posterity.
ANONYMOUS: You make an interesting and important point: No one can prove a negative. However, what DOES matter is that B.O. DOESN'T HAVE ANY 'PROOF' OR INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE, AND INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE, TO DEMONSTRATE THAT HE IS WHAT HE CLAIMS TO BE - AND ONE MUST HAVE 'PROOF' FOR A CLAIM.
And the further point IS that if one is going to BE 'President of the united States,' YOU MUST PROVE THAT YOU WERE BORN HERE. An INDEPENDENTLY SOURCED item, that can also be proven in its existential age INDEPENDENTLY, provides such proof.
Logically, you can't prove anyone "wasn't born here" if they DON'T have a LEGITIMATE AND VERIFIABLY LEGITIMATE independent source of such evidence of birth in the U.S.. BUT THE POINT IS that to prove such a claim, YOU MUST HAVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT. B.O. DOESN'T HAVE SUCH EVIDENCE - there is no legitimate REASON to believe he was 'born here' WITHOUT INDEPENDENT IMPERSONAL EVIDENCE to that effect. No one, who can't "prove it" in such a manner, has ANY BUSINESS even thinking about, LET ALONE PRETENDING TO BE, "the President of the united States."
Again, this strikes to the very heart of the legitimacy of the government, which has not been truly legitimate since (I must correct a previous post) 1861. However, whereas our opponents have consistently heretofore claimed it was "just a matter of INTERPRETATION," and so "took the wind out of our sails," THIS IS QUITE LITERALLY 'A MATTER OF FACT,' FOR ALL TO SEE. It's Constitutionally simple: NO PROOF, NO LEGITIMACY. No reason so to believe. Now it's OUR TURN "to knock the wind out of THEIR sails."
Please realize that if "we" support such a claim WITHOUT REASON, it means we are in serious existential trouble. It means we have become fundamentally IRRATIONAL as 'a people,' and there will be NO limit to the ensuing mendacity. End of story.
TIMOTHY P.: Thank you very much, not only for your kind words, but also for your words of brilliant insight: "You've hinted at a critical aspect of our national decline, and that is that we are faced with severe spiritual decay."
You are absolutely right. Indeed, we as a people (we, the Southron People) must ask ourselves: "WHAT is 'The Good Order'?" I'd like to deal moe with that later.
If you'd be interested, I'd like to suggest 3 or 4 other items I, for one, have found very helpful in my understanding of American political thought, but I don't recall their full titles, authors, right now, and I've "got to get going." Thanks again for your kind remarks. Nick R.
Timothy P.: Maybe you've given up this thread and moved on, but here are the promised titles:
The ANTI-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates, edited by Ralph Ketcham (Signet Classics) - very inexpensive and the Intro by Ketcham is more than worth the price of the book;
The Anti-Federalists, ed. by Bruce Frohnen, Foreword by Jos. Sobran (another of the Conservative Book Club's "Conservative Leadership Series" - can be found inexpensively on Amazon Used & New);
Debate On the Constitution, Part One & Part Two, "edited" by Bernard Bailyn, The Library of America (generally LoA is Leftist, but this set is tremendous); a "gotta have", like the one above;
Defending the Republic - Constitutional Morality In a Time of Crisis, Bruce P. Frohnen & Kenneth L. Grasso, editors;
A Moral Enterprise - Politics, Reason & The Human Good, K.L. Grasso & R.P. Hunt, editors, from the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, www.isi.org/books/index.aspx; this title & the one above will give you a profound understanding of what lies behind "Conservatism" and "Liberalism" - they will answer the "why" behind everything in politics for the past 100 years; you will have an understanding unmatched even by many so-called "professors" (who are virtually ALL Marxist-Liberal anyway, and destroying our people).
I believe you will enjoy these titles greatly - I hope you find them useful - after all, understanding is everything.
Gentlemen,
Rather than letting ourselves spend too much time on a topic that CANNOT be proven, why don't we instead focus on the actual, provable soft spots in DC's armor? Such as how its "post-racial" champion is clearly just another race hustler who may pretend to be a healer, but is instead inflaming racial tensions for political gain?
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/081130_book.htm
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/5225221/the-mask-slips.thtml
I love ya, Mike. But, I'm a bit disappointed that you don't care where Obama was born.
Exposing lies and liars is kind of exciting.
We, the Secessionists, are the underdogs. I, like King David, implore God to take revenge upon my enemies..
The MSM calls those who challenge his citizenship "birthers" (just as they call the 9/11 skeptics "truthers". I appreciate what Orly Taitz and Alan Keyes are doing to frustrate the puppet and his puppeteteers....
At least, if Obamination was dethroned, it would send the little rats scurrrying and fill them with anxiety. The thought of this is pleasurable.
There's not much fun in waiting for the Empire to collapse. The eligibility question provides some comic relief as we wait.
Jean Allen
Tuscaloosa
jean allen,
I completely understand that we shouldn't miss an opportunity to poke the Empire in its figurative eye whenever possible, but I'm afraid this issue is making us look foolish instead. As I mentioned earlier, this is such an emotional issue that some folks aren't going to be convinced no matter what.
I'm just suggestin there are better things to focus on, such as publicizing the wrongs we KNOW DC is guilty of.
China and Russia put the blame on some screwed up experiments of US for the earthquake that happened in Haiti.
Chinese and Russian Military scientists, these reports say, are concurring with Canadian researcher, and former Asia-Pacific Bureau Chief of Forbes Magazine, Benjamin Fulford, who in a very disturbing video released from his Japanese offices to the American public, details how the United States attacked China by the firing of a 90 Million Volt Shockwave from the Americans High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facilities in Alaska
If we can recollect a previous news when US blamed Russia for the earthquake in Georgio. What do you guys think? Is it really possible to create an earthquake by humans?
I came across this [url=http://universalages.com/hot-news/what-happened-in-haiti-is-it-related-to-haarp/]article about Haiti Earthquake[/url] in some blog it seems very interesting, but conspiracy theories have always been there.
China and Russia put the blame on some screwed up experiments of US for the earthquake that happened in Haiti.
Chinese and Russian Military scientists, these reports say, are concurring with Canadian researcher, and former Asia-Pacific Bureau Chief of Forbes Magazine, Benjamin Fulford, who in a very disturbing video released from his Japanese offices to the American public, details how the United States attacked China by the firing of a 90 Million Volt Shockwave from the Americans High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facilities in Alaska
If we can recollect a previous news when US blamed Russia for the earthquake in Georgio. What do you guys think? Is it really possible to create an earthquake by humans?
I came across this [url=http://universalages.com/hot-news/what-happened-in-haiti-is-it-related-to-haarp/]article about Haiti Earthquake[/url] in some blog it seems very interesting, but conspiracy theories have always been there.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home