Southern Heritage and the Constitution under fire
The Obama Revolution will complete the globalist agenda of uprooting our cultural and political traditions and imposing an all-powerful central government on what's left of the American people. And it will be done in the name of the Founding Fathers. That's Obama's genius, the ability to implement a radical program behind a veneer of conservatism.
This isn't idle speculation or fear-mongering, it's simply a matter of believing Obama's own words. Here, he reveals both his socialistic goals and his contempt for the Constitution's restrictions on government power:
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
He's right, of course -- the limited government established by the Founders could never impose socialism. To Obama, and many others, that's a problem.
How do you disconnect a people from their political traditions? By redefining their sense of who they are; in other words, by stripping them of their identity. Take their heritage from them, and they'll be putty in your hands.
The most committed socialists in government understand this. Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr, for example, has made clear his goal of creating "a more perfect union" by empowering the government to provide for health care, tuition, and housing -- in other words, creating a socialist system. What prevents him from achieving that goal? Two things: cultural distrust of activist government, which Jackson recognizes as an integral part of the present-day Southern Cause, and the constraints of the Constitution, as he explicitly states here in this speech to National Park Service employees:
Dr. James McPherson said that nearly all the first ten amendments to the Constitution apply the phrase "shall not" to the federal government. In fact, eleven of the first twelve amendments place limitations on the power of the national government. However, beginning with the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865, six of the next seven amendments radically expanded the power of the federal government at the expense of the states. Every one of them grants significant new powers to the government with the phrase "Congress shall have the power to enforce this article." We need to revive this tradition of positive amendments, which is what I propose to do.
Congressman Jackson will get his chance to re-introduce his socialist program under the Obama administration, which clearly shares Jackson's philosophy and goals. Just the fact that no Southerners have been appointed into the Obama administration tells us what we can expect for the next few years.


13 Comments:
There is a plausible theory floating around in academic circles that the only way to combat the real enemy, corporate power, is to strengthen the power of government, at least temporarily.
Of course the problem with that is toning it down after you've cranked it up.
Ultimately, human societies are most successful when they are organized locally with local, democratic decision making. But that type of social organization only exists in small pockets today, so widely dispersed as to have little chance when faced with corporate behemoths.
I frankly don't see how we can get our energy and health care issues under control without federal intervention. Free enterprise can't solve the energy problem because free enterprise is about making a profit, and the profit/growth motive lies at the root of our environmental issues. It lies at the core of what's destroyed our small towns and what destroyed the formerly agrarian South. Not that profit in and of itself is bad; it's not. But a runaway growth economy most certainly is bad.
Excellent piece, Mr. Tuggle. While breathless legions celebrate the government that rules them, we choose to be different and expect Jefferson's words to actually mean what they say. In celebration of MLK day, I choose to celebrate the holiday the way secular progressives honor Christmas - by calling the man behind the holiday a fraud, while enjoying the day off work.
Speaking of today's celebration, y'all. . .
Happy Robert R. Lee day.
In fact, Happy Lee-Jackson week.
Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson were, each of them, four times the men "Honest Abe" and MLK were. They dwarf such non-entities as you discuss here, Mr. Tuggle, by comparison. And this year I will keep my mind focused on them for the entire week. I take no thought of MLK or tomorrow's inauguration (which means, yes, I'm not watching a minute of it.)
I choose to take the long view of history, because "it is history that teaches us to hope."
Onward and upward, gentlemen!
Good place to mention this if it hasn't been already.
Reckon most folks have already watched.
I caught wind of it on a South African forum a while back !
The movie - Warriors of Honor. Well worth the money.
http://www.christianrealityvideos.com/videos/vs-vid329.htm
I just love two things about your posts:
1. You rely on outwardly biased "sources" such as worlddailynet that make the good old Weekly World News look like fine journalism.
2. Many of the "sources" you site are old and outdated. I call to your attention your recent posting of an article from 1988 and trying to attach it to an article today.
Time for some improvements, folks.......
Possum,
The first step is to realize that the Federal government IS the problem. Name a problem, and you'll quickly see DC created it or worsened it.
southernfreedom1861,
I usually celebrate MLK day by cheating on my wife and plagiarizing other bloggers' work.
I was too busy this year.
Snaggle-Tooth Jones,
At times like this, it's good to remind ourselves that men like Lee and Jackson once lived. Even better, they were widely respected as role models.
Now we worship illusions.
Anonymous,
I'll have you know I use only the finest sources for my news and commentary. There's the moonshiner next door who knows all the latest goings-on, and I run everything I write by the fortune teller who drives by every morning in her dog cart.
So there.
Michael, I don't disagree that the Federal government is a huge problem. But I also believe corporate power is just as big of a problem today. I think you have to tackle the corporate issue first. It's the easier target.
The government will fall on its own. Perhaps not in our lifetimes but it cannot sustain its position of power much beyond another 50 or so years. If that.
I spent January 19th celebrating the birth of Robert E. Lee, he indeed was a great American...MLK? Just your garden variety Marxist.
Possum,
It's a mutually supporting system we're up against. Since 1865, the Federal government has served as the cash cow of politically connected big business. The cycle of contributions, subsidies, and pro-big business policies must be broken before it breaks us.
Pat Houseworth,
Way to go! General Lee is a true hero and role model. MLK is an icon for interventionist government and globalism.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home