About that smear ...
The League of the South's primary purpose is to preserve Southern culture. There are many attitudes, customs, and values wrapped up in the term "culture," but the primary ones are instantly associated with the South -- distrust of big government, loyalty to one's family, love of tradition, and of course, faith. We believe those are things worth preserving and fighting for.
It is our public defense of those attitudes and values that keeps getting us in hot water. Just to name one example, we're all too aware that DC's Open Borders policy can lead to one outcome, and that is the destruction of our traditional way of life. No nation, no people, no culture can hope to exist without a homeland within which it is sovereign, and in which it can grow and flourish. And it is precisely because we wish to preserve an organic culture that generates its own social and political order that ambitious centralizers wish to weaken, and eventually destroy, us. Because we oppose an increasingly greedy, power-hungry ruling elite, we are demonized.
Oppose the regime's agenda, and you'll be demonized, too.
Here's yet another example. Leftists who object to globalism are similarly demonized. Here are our old friends in the Southern Poverty Law Center linking leftists and anarchists protesting globalist corporations as -- hold on -- Nazi sympathizers:
Right alongside the "progressive" groups that demonstrated in Seattle — mostly peaceful defenders of labor, the environment, animal rights and similar causes — were the hard-edged soldiers of neofascism. They carried signs decrying "The New World Order Agenda," bitterly denounced "Jewish media plus big capital" and, in at least one case, fought it out with black youths amidst the tear gas. ...
The common enemy was, in a word, globalism.
They despise capitalism, with its tendency to concentrate wealth and to make people and economies more and more alike — turning the planet into what is seen as a bland and materialistic McWorld. They pine for nations of peasant-like folk tied closely to the land and to their neighbors. They fight for a pristine environment, a land unsullied by corporate agriculture and urbanization. ...
As the German Nazis said: "Blood and Soil."
My, but doesn't that condemnation sound familiar -- and well it should, because it echoes what the SPLC said about Pat Buchanan's book, State of Emergency, in which he warned of the consequences of floodtide immigration:
To put it plainly, State of Emergency is a white nationalist tract. The thesis is that America must retain a white majority to survive as a nation. It is rooted in a blood-and-soil nationalism more blood than soil. The echoes of Nazi ideology are clear and chilling.
Nazis, Nazis, everywhere! And if you don't submit to the party line and accept the social, political, and economic revolution the globalists are imposing on this nation, you're a Nazi, too.
Why does the SPLC resort to that extreme smear? Because it works. It bludgeons dissidents back into line. The SPLC's purpose is not to exchange ideas, or defend minorities, but to serve the realm by delegitimizing dissent -- and make a ton of money in the meantime.
So please keep that in mind the next time you hear the League of the South -- or any group of dissidents -- is a "hate group" that's full of "racists."

5 Comments:
We've had that here, too. On Sunday, I went to see the movie "Washington You're Fired!" When I got back to my car, I found a flyer proclaiming that the sponsor of the showing, a paper called Liberty Voice, was, along with a group called "Columbus 911 Truth" were "voices for Neo-Nazis and Antisemites".
Why? Because they each found some good articles in The American Free Press (it used to be called The Spotlight, so the pamphleteer (who decided to remain anonymous) projected the entire editorial policy of that publication onto the two local organizations.
I do not agree with everything I read in Liberty Voice, and I am skeptical about the 9-11 allegations, but to call either Neo-Nazis or Anti-Semites is way, way over the top!
I suppose the PC establishment has to resort to namecalling and "guilt by association", because they know they can't come up with any rational arguments for their cause.
harold thomas,
Yes, that's yet another example. It's kind of creepy, though, that someone went to the trouble to place a flyer in the parking lot where that film was shown.
They must be REALLY afraid of the message.
Well, you've got to hand it to the SPLC . . . they have an integrity in a kind of way. They don't just condemn right-wing groups, which is easy in the current political climate. They even take on left-wing globalists in the first passage cited.
They really show their colors, however, when they claim that any anti-globalist is somehow a hate-monger. Scary . . .
brad c,
Yes, and that's the point -- "racism" was originally an attack on traditionalists who resisted the "one-size-fits-all" schemes of the triumphant Bolsheviks. Today, if you resist the "one-size-fits-all" schemes of the Neocon globalists, then you're guilty of "hate."
The SPLC is simply a jewish group bent on destroying the white race.
Post a Comment
<< Home